| Document Type | | Related Information | Uploaded On |
|
COMPLAINT
|
|
Complaint for patent infringement.
|
01 Oct 2008
|
|
MEMORANDUM
|
|
Because Rembrandt has failed adequately to plead any claim for relief
and has failed to plead facts showing it has suffered an injury-in-
fact with respect to Canon, Canon respectfully requests that the
Court dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint against Canon without leave to
amend.
|
17 Dec 2008
|
|
MEMORANDUM
|
|
Rembrandts Complaint is so vague and devoid of facts that it fails to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Therefore, AOL
respectfully requests that AOLs Motion to Dismiss be granted and
Rembrandts Complaint be dismissed.
|
17 Dec 2008
|
|
ORDER
|
|
ORDERED that Canon, Inc. and Canon business solutions, Inc. motion to
dismiss is Granted
|
17 Dec 2008
|
|
NOTICE OF APPEAL
|
|
Patent-holding company Rembrandt Data Technologies LP is again picking up the sword in its infringement battle against a group of defendants including DirecTV Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co., launching an appeal of the dismissal of its claims over patents covering Internet dial-up technology.
|
12 Nov 2009
|
|
CIVIL DOCKET
|
|
Notice of Hearing Date June 9, 2009 re 375 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Hoptman, Virginia) (Entered: 05/07/2009).REPLY to Response to Motion re 365 MOTION to Compel Hewlett-Packard filed by Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit)(Hoptman, Virginia) Text Modified on 5/7/2009 To Reflect Under Seal Exhibit To Document Received 5/7/09 and Filed In Civil Vault on 5/7/09. (nhall). (Entered: 05/07/2009).
|
15 Sep 2011
|
|
MARKMAN HEARING
|
|
Markman hearing (mm/dd/yyyy). Please see the attached document for the more details. For proceedings.
|
03 Jan 2012
|